SFGAmWorld.com
Untitled Document
Park Information
Latest News
Great America
Roller Coasters
Rides
Hurricane Harbor
Water Slides
Water Attractions
Advertisement

Disaster Plan: What if Six Flags Went Bankrupt

Talk about anything that has to do with the amusement park industry here.
Postby Galvan on July 26th, 2004, 11:24 am
Looking over Six Flags numbers (PKS on NYSE) the company has over the first 6 months of this year... Sucked

In fact Montey Fool the stock/business analysis website states that

"Six Flags while its embitions where high with its first ad campaign in 7 years, have apperently missed the "bus" this year so far."

So I was thinking what if Six Flags suddendly plundged into Bankrupty or worse.. Liquidation.. then what?

Well heres how I beleive things would happen.

Cedar Fair and Paramount would wage a huge bidding war for Six Flags 2 premire parks. Magic Mountain and Great America, especially in the case of Great America since neither CF or Paramount have parks in our region.

As for the smaller parks. You probably would see smaller amusement comapny's buy them EX. SFKK,SFSTL

The Mid sized parks probably would be purchased by Paramount as well since Paramount doesnt have as big of national presence as say Six Flags or Cedar Fair.

Six Flags America for example would be a perfect Paramount location considering its close proxtimity to the Major Cities in the Northeast.

Now for the dump parks in the SF chain, (SFSTL might just have to be on this list) If unable to find a buyer, these parks would have to close unless another firm could purchase the land/rides etc.

As for Great America if Six Flags were to ever go belly up, our Gurnee Jewel will still be there in all its glory but you might be riding Raging Snoopy instead of Raging Bull....
Image
Galvan
Moderator

User avatar
 
Posts: 3639
Joined: June 30th, 2003, 1:23 am
Location: Montgomery,IL

Postby Virtua Tennis on July 26th, 2004, 11:27 am
They will never, ever sell GAm which is one of if not their highest revenue park unless they go under and sell of the parks. They have been very, very crowded lately this season and they'll be fine.
Premiers a bunch of dumbasses which is why they'll be in debt for years to come, and which is why SFMM, their biggest park, is having major problems. They have WAY too many parks that don't bring in any revenue at all (SFWoA was one of them even though they spent millions and millions on it, just to sell it after losing seasons).
Virtua Tennis

User avatar
 
Posts: 769
Joined: July 13th, 2004, 6:19 am

Postby coasterzak on July 26th, 2004, 11:30 am
On the same page - what would happen to an amusement park if a bunch of workers began to quit and they didn't have the force of people to work the park? Would they have to close a park? Would they just open with some shut down rides? I know the story in Aurora was that they had a ton of people working the park earlier in the season and they have lost a ton recently. Would a park ever go under because of this?
coasterzak

User avatar
 
Posts: 1597
Joined: December 29th, 2002, 6:09 pm
Location: Ohio, 8 hours from SFGAm

Postby The Beast on July 26th, 2004, 12:06 pm
Um the first post was hilarious...Did you forget about this little park thats called SFGAdv? It pulls in more money that any other SF park and has the 13 highest attendence in the world. (I'm not sure if it brings the most money, please correct me if I'm wrong). Cedar Point doesn't even have that high of attendence.
Also when did Cedar Fair get national presence? :roll: The only thing they have presence with is CP and KBF. I mean come on.
Justin
The Beast

User avatar
 
Posts: 711
Joined: June 20th, 2004, 11:06 pm
Location: New Haven,IN (Suburb of Ft.Wayne)

Postby SFGAm Rules on July 26th, 2004, 12:15 pm
SFMM isn't quite the best park in the chain:
Click Here
SFGAm Rules

 
Posts: 459
Joined: July 14th, 2004, 9:39 pm

Postby Virtua Tennis on July 26th, 2004, 12:33 pm
No one said it was.
Virtua Tennis

User avatar
 
Posts: 769
Joined: July 13th, 2004, 6:19 am

Postby SFGAm Rules on July 26th, 2004, 12:36 pm
Galvan316 wrote:Cedar Fair and Paramount would wage a huge bidding war for Six Flags 2 premire parks. Magic Mountain and Great America
SFGAm Rules

 
Posts: 459
Joined: July 14th, 2004, 9:39 pm

Postby Virtua Tennis on July 26th, 2004, 12:41 pm
They bring in a lot of $$, he never said it was good.
Virtua Tennis

User avatar
 
Posts: 769
Joined: July 13th, 2004, 6:19 am

Postby w00dland on July 26th, 2004, 12:56 pm
SFGAm Rules wrote:SFMM isn't quite the best park in the chain:
Click Here


Any park can bring in a lot of money when they are open year round.
Top 5 wood-5-Goliath 4-Ravine Flyer II 3-Phoenix 2-Voyage 1-El Toro
Top 5 Steel- 5-Velocicoaster 4- Maverick 3- Fury 325 2-Steel Vengeance 1-X2
Coaster Count: 444
w00dland
Moderator

User avatar
 
Posts: 4630
Joined: January 29th, 2004, 2:36 pm
Location: Winter Haven, FL

Postby Virtua Tennis on July 26th, 2004, 12:57 pm
Less and less maintenence funds and high attendance.

Sounds like a profit to me ;).
Virtua Tennis

User avatar
 
Posts: 769
Joined: July 13th, 2004, 6:19 am

Postby Ron/Wolf on July 26th, 2004, 1:26 pm
Ladies and Gentelmen Six Flags Great America Will Close Forever Tonight Thanks For The Great Run. Coming soon Toy's R Us Dominicks and Walgreens. Seems like I lived that once already?
Ron/Wolf

 
Posts: 124
Joined: April 7th, 2004, 4:33 pm

Postby Galvan on July 26th, 2004, 3:42 pm
The Beast wrote:Um the first post was hilarious...Did you forget about this little park thats called SFGAdv? It pulls in more money that any other SF park and has the 13 highest attendence in the world. (



Well, sorry i didnt memorize all to the attendance figures of every major world amusement park. Next time ill be sure to consult you prior to my posts.

Anyway, Brad what makes you think SF if they where going to belly up wouldnt sell SFGAM? just because you think so? i doubt that.... It happens in businesses all the time. Case in point In 1990 Pan Am sold its highly profitable pacific routes to United Airlines in an 800 millon dollar deal. TWA sold its very profitable JFK hub in 1998 much to the sigrin of its sharehlders and employees alike. (Yes, its not the same thing but big business is big business.)

"Cedar Fair doesnt have a national presence"

Since when did MIA and the park in KC didnt make CF have a national presense? apperently Kansas City and Michigan dont count as parts of the United States anymore.

And what makes you guys think that CF or Paramount or Hell even Disney wouldnt bid like crazy to buy SFMM? Six Flags' biggest park that has 16 major roller coasters wouldnt purchase that park given the chance. I never claimed to say this was the exact plan of how things where going to happen, hell i said what if this happened. But i know from my college courses a little bit of how business works.
Image
Galvan
Moderator

User avatar
 
Posts: 3639
Joined: June 30th, 2003, 1:23 am
Location: Montgomery,IL

Postby The Beast on July 26th, 2004, 4:16 pm
Um...The numbers were just to back up my point. I don't memorize attendence figures, I just remember stuff like that. People forget time and time again that GAdv, is their cash cow, even though its not open year round.
Also national presence of CF...they have like 6 parks!!! 4 of them are in the midwest, Dorney in the east, and KBF, in the west. Its not like they are SF or anything. And I think my idea of "national presence" is a little more than just location. When you say Six Flags people know what you are talking about. When I say Cedar Fair the average person wouldnt know what they are.
Justin
The Beast

User avatar
 
Posts: 711
Joined: June 20th, 2004, 11:06 pm
Location: New Haven,IN (Suburb of Ft.Wayne)

Postby planea380 on July 26th, 2004, 5:23 pm
If SFGADV was there most profitable park knowing Six flags/premier's ways GADV would be getting a major new attraction every year.
planea380

User avatar
 
Posts: 1132
Joined: June 1st, 2003, 7:48 pm

Postby Timmy179 on July 26th, 2004, 5:47 pm
Remember, Bankruptcy doesnt mean the end of a company.
Around the world and back
Timmy179
Member Spotlight Guy

User avatar
 
Posts: 2240
Joined: January 26th, 2003, 2:13 pm
Location: I Ain't No Hollaback Girl

Postby planea380 on July 26th, 2004, 5:53 pm
Matters which type of bankruptcy.
planea380

User avatar
 
Posts: 1132
Joined: June 1st, 2003, 7:48 pm

Postby The Beast on July 26th, 2004, 6:32 pm
Um...SFGADv has been getting new rides pretty much every year now. Remember in 99' ? They added 25 rides, and they have been adding coasters since. This year was one year they didnt add a coaster. There is already rumors for a 05 coaster.
Justin
The Beast

User avatar
 
Posts: 711
Joined: June 20th, 2004, 11:06 pm
Location: New Haven,IN (Suburb of Ft.Wayne)

Postby sfgamer2 on July 26th, 2004, 7:00 pm
If sf goes bankrupt and cedar fair and paramounts buy each of the parks, I'd rather have sfgam bought by cedar fair trusting that they wouldn't fill it up with vekoma rollercoasters and keeping sfgam an amusement park not a roller coaster park. I'd really like cedar fair to only get b and m roller coasters. But I'm thinking too literal.

You guys really need to keep positive thoughts.
You see I like the cubs and the white sox. If it came down to the world series I'd pick the cubs.
sfgamer2

User avatar
 
Posts: 168
Joined: July 26th, 2004, 6:21 pm

Postby Chitown on July 26th, 2004, 7:07 pm
Mike???

You know damn well where you got the idea of CF and Paramount putting their bids in the hat if SF shut its doors.

CF and Paramount would salivate at the chance to get into the Chicago market.
I finally retired the Sarah Palin signature because she is now 100% irrelevant.
Chitown

User avatar
 
Posts: 2563
Joined: December 31st, 2002, 12:27 am
Location: Gotham City

Postby greatamerica2003 on July 26th, 2004, 8:45 pm
Did anyone forget about companies that dont necissarily OWN any parks? Tribune Company, Time Warner (was already in the park business, and could be again) possibly MGM (owns the MGM-Grand Casino Hotel in Vegas)?

Premier knows FULL WELL that its going to VERY DIFFICULT to sell any parks that are part of the original 7, and not be named Six Flags parks. They aren't going to want to part with the Six Flags name, but they know they are going to have to just for the sake of getting cash. Some big company is going to buy the Six Flags name, and a few of the parks and form a new company/division called Six Flags if this were all to come to pass.

Not sell GA because its one of the better performing parks? Gimme a break. When a company is looking to make cash, they unload their big moneymakers and DOWNSIZE.

I wouldnt be surprised if Time Warner wants to get back into the park business. Its a different leadership over there than it was when they unloaded six flags, and its the only large media giant that doesn't delve into theme parks.

TW- Nothing
Disney/ABC-Disney Parks
Viacom- Paramount Parks
NBC- Universal Parks

I think that Paramount would do a good job, even though PGA is a shadow of its former self (the GM who was at PGA is gone now). I think Cedar Fair is too fresh off a buying spree to shell out that dough.
YOU ARE A FAILURE AT LIFE!
greatamerica2003
amtrak
amtrak

 
Posts: 781
Joined: January 23rd, 2003, 12:57 am
Location: Planet Earth, Milky Way Galaxy

Postby rct2wizard360 on July 26th, 2004, 11:02 pm
For SFGAm? We're talking bg bucks here. I dont think thats gunna happen anytime......soon. Just think, what would they call it? Its kinda scary to think about. :?
rct2wizard360

User avatar
 
Posts: 2996
Joined: December 4th, 2003, 11:23 pm
Location: Mason, Ohio

Postby Chitown on July 26th, 2004, 11:45 pm
Well, it was called Marriott's at one time so why would it matter if another company purchased it?

While I like SF owning the park, if for some odd reason they went belly up, I would love Paramount to take it over. Yes, you heard me right, Paramount, not Cedar Fair.

At least with Paramount, you get decent themed characters in the park and some half way decent themed rides.
I finally retired the Sarah Palin signature because she is now 100% irrelevant.
Chitown

User avatar
 
Posts: 2563
Joined: December 31st, 2002, 12:27 am
Location: Gotham City

Postby rct2wizard360 on July 26th, 2004, 11:59 pm
Superman with another name? I cant picture it. Too much theming (what am I saying :shock: ) has been put into it to NOT be called Superman: Ultimate Flght.
rct2wizard360

User avatar
 
Posts: 2996
Joined: December 4th, 2003, 11:23 pm
Location: Mason, Ohio

Postby coasterzak on July 27th, 2004, 10:15 am
Yeah, don't let Cedar Fair take over of you won't be able to reride - V2 would become Steel Venom, Batman - Talon, Superman - Thunderhawk, and Deja Vu - The Dominator! ;)
coasterzak

User avatar
 
Posts: 1597
Joined: December 29th, 2002, 6:09 pm
Location: Ohio, 8 hours from SFGAm

Postby sfgamer2 on July 27th, 2004, 10:41 am
rct2wizard360 wrote:Just think, what would they call it? Its kinda scary to think about. :?


Yeah I know. But what if Marriott's bought sfgam again? They wouldn't get rid of the territories at the park.
You see I like the cubs and the white sox. If it came down to the world series I'd pick the cubs.
sfgamer2

User avatar
 
Posts: 168
Joined: July 26th, 2004, 6:21 pm

Next

Return to General Coaster Talk

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests

Privacy Policy About Us Copyright Disclaimer E-Mail SFGAmWorld
COPYRIGHT - SFGAmWorld.com
All content and images on this site are Copyright 2001 - SFGAmWorld.com and may not be used without permission.
This is NOT the official site of Six Flags Great America, SFGAmWorld.com is not affilated or endorsed by Six Flags Great America.
SFGAmWorld.com does not make any guarantee on the accuracy of the information on this website and cannot be held responsible by the use of this information.
SIX FLAGS and all related indicia are trademarks of Six Flags Theme Parks Inc. ®, TM and © . The official Six Flags site can be found at SixFlags.com
BATMAN, SUPERMAN and all related characters and elements are trademarks of © DC Comics.
LOONEY TUNES and all related characters and elements are trademarks of and © Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.©
The Wiggles Pty Ltd. SCOOBY-DOO and all related characters and elements are trademarks of and © Hanna-Barbera.