Oh well, but if they owned the land, and now some type of buisness is going to pop up, do you think GAm sold the land for some pocket cash? If so this can somewhat explain the new expansion and rides this year.
But honestly, I dont mind! No need to have a water park in Gurnee, Can only be open for 5 months of the yr really, not to mention Wisconsin Dells is only a few hours away, So you can always make a trip up there, specially since 1/2 of there hotels have indoor parks!
mallclerks wrote:No need to have a water park in Gurnee, Can only be open for 5 months of the yr really, not to mention Wisconsin Dells is only a few hours away, So you can always make a trip up there, specially since 1/2 of there hotels have indoor parks!
I think it would be indoor, but I'm not really sure. You're right about Wisconsin Dells, that would be too much competition. And now that the new waterpark not owned by SFGAm is probably going up, SF would definately not put their own up. I don't really mind, since I'd rather have more rides than a new water park.