SFGAmWorld.com
Untitled Document
Park Information
Latest News
Great America
Roller Coasters
Rides
Hurricane Harbor
Water Slides
Water Attractions
Advertisement

Intrimidator 305

Talk about anything that has to do with the amusement park industry here.
Postby kahmooza on May 22nd, 2010, 5:59 pm
Just a heads up if anyone was planning a trip to ride I305:

The first drop is now trimmed for the last 2/3rds of the drop. I flew out here this weekend to try it, and boy was I less than thrilled by that drop. The first few feet were great, but then it just king of drooped down the drop, giving no dropping sensation.

Since I've never been here before, it was still a worthwhile trip. Dominator and Volcano are awesome and if you haven't been here its worth a trip.

But if you are planning a return trip to try this new giga coaster, I'm pretty sure you'd be better off heading to sandusky instead. MF has a better drop, and Mav has better ground elements.

Total shame, it definetly had potential, and from what I read from the last couple weeks it was pretty intense. I only got to try post neutered 305 so I can't compare, but I highly doubt the first weeks riders from before would feel the same way after trying it again now.

Just wanted to pop in here and save other chicago folk from traveling this far for a giga coaster that doesn't hold a candle to MF anymore (which is alot closer to us).

Ride on!!!
Broadway Joe
kahmooza

User avatar
 
Posts: 584
Joined: May 10th, 2004, 12:21 pm

Postby david on May 22nd, 2010, 8:08 pm
Ah hell, that's horrible! If you can't handle the ride, don't ride it! That's just terrible that they would destroy a coaster. But this also shows how one set of trims can destroy a ride. :/
david

 
Posts: 1546
Joined: September 27th, 2009, 11:29 am
Location: Northwest Suburbs

Postby monsterfan99 on May 22nd, 2010, 9:00 pm
It has more to do with the fact Intamin/Cedar Fair has no clue what this ride would be like. Daily it is going through multi-thousand dollar wheels and graying people out. Once again, why do parks buy Intamin rides?
monsterfan99

User avatar
 
Posts: 1693
Joined: September 23rd, 2008, 4:48 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Postby david on May 22nd, 2010, 9:20 pm
I have no idea. I mean, Six Flags finally realized that Intamin isn't a good designer after all the problems with v2. (holding break, supports, random heat issues.)
david

 
Posts: 1546
Joined: September 27th, 2009, 11:29 am
Location: Northwest Suburbs

Postby Cole on May 23rd, 2010, 8:38 pm
I heard rumors that Cedar Fairs has decided to take the trims down. I also heard they were changing the restraints to so...

Image
Credit goes to TPR.

Does this look more like a trim, or sensor type thing?
Top 5: 1) El Toro. 2) Maverick. 3) Millenium Force. 4) Diamondback. 5) X2.
Coaster Count: 167 (41 Wood, 125 Steel)
@Coaster_Cole on Twitter
Cole

 
Posts: 1224
Joined: January 7th, 2010, 4:00 pm
Location: Milwaukee

Postby RagingBullFan on May 23rd, 2010, 9:18 pm
That is the mount that the trims are attached to.

http://www.themeparkreview.com/forum/vi ... start=4120
Licensed Mechanical Engineer
Image
RagingBullFan
Technical Administrator

User avatar
 
Posts: 1478
Images: 1
Joined: December 27th, 2002, 11:52 am

Postby Cole on May 24th, 2010, 7:08 am
Ahh, I see. Well atleast he thinks its a smoother ride. I heard complaints of major grey outs and it being more shakey then Kingda Ka so yeah, while it kills part of the ride, it makes the rest more enjoyable.
Top 5: 1) El Toro. 2) Maverick. 3) Millenium Force. 4) Diamondback. 5) X2.
Coaster Count: 167 (41 Wood, 125 Steel)
@Coaster_Cole on Twitter
Cole

 
Posts: 1224
Joined: January 7th, 2010, 4:00 pm
Location: Milwaukee

Postby david on May 24th, 2010, 7:13 am
Have you ever heard of B&M making modifications to it's coasters mid-season? Have you heard of people completely passing out on B&M's or for that matter any other coaster?

Intamin needs to really get it's safety standards up before another coaster is built. I have a feeling this new support system won't last all too long, and they'll start adding supports soon enough.

Again, Why do people still buy from Intamin? Unless it's been tested before, and it wasn't problematic, WHY?
david

 
Posts: 1546
Joined: September 27th, 2009, 11:29 am
Location: Northwest Suburbs

Postby w00dland on May 24th, 2010, 2:00 pm
Intamin takes risks, and sometimes they pay off. B&M keeps things safe, and their coasters get boring.

Give a little take a little.
Top 5 wood-5-Goliath 4-Ravine Flyer II 3-Phoenix 2-Voyage 1-El Toro
Top 5 Steel- 5-Velocicoaster 4- Maverick 3- Fury 325 2-Steel Vengeance 1-X2
Coaster Count: 444
w00dland
Moderator

User avatar
 
Posts: 4630
Joined: January 29th, 2004, 2:36 pm
Location: Winter Haven, FL

Postby david on May 24th, 2010, 3:25 pm
Name me a B&M Coaster that you have gotten bored on? You can't honestly say that B&M makes boring coasters. B&M cares about their customer satisfaction.
david

 
Posts: 1546
Joined: September 27th, 2009, 11:29 am
Location: Northwest Suburbs

Postby Cole on May 24th, 2010, 3:43 pm
^Iron Wolf
Top 5: 1) El Toro. 2) Maverick. 3) Millenium Force. 4) Diamondback. 5) X2.
Coaster Count: 167 (41 Wood, 125 Steel)
@Coaster_Cole on Twitter
Cole

 
Posts: 1224
Joined: January 7th, 2010, 4:00 pm
Location: Milwaukee

Postby david on May 24th, 2010, 3:46 pm
So you could fall asleep right there? Interesting.
david

 
Posts: 1546
Joined: September 27th, 2009, 11:29 am
Location: Northwest Suburbs

Postby Cole on May 24th, 2010, 4:02 pm
If I took a few advils before and lowered the seat down low, probably.
Top 5: 1) El Toro. 2) Maverick. 3) Millenium Force. 4) Diamondback. 5) X2.
Coaster Count: 167 (41 Wood, 125 Steel)
@Coaster_Cole on Twitter
Cole

 
Posts: 1224
Joined: January 7th, 2010, 4:00 pm
Location: Milwaukee

Postby david on May 24th, 2010, 6:41 pm
Haaah! So you can't! lol
david

 
Posts: 1546
Joined: September 27th, 2009, 11:29 am
Location: Northwest Suburbs

Postby FParker185 on May 24th, 2010, 7:26 pm
He might be confused with the difference between sleeping and being beaten unconscious :)

I could probably fall asleep on certain B&M coasters though, Raging Bull, Floorless at SFNE, Medusa, Apollos Chariot, it seems like B&M made some pretty intense rides up til 1999 then they turned into almost completely forceless cookie cutters until recently where they are picking it up again with rides like Goliath, Diamondback, etc.
Favorite Wood Coasters: The Voyage, Ravine Flyer II, Thunderhead, Balder
Favorite Steel: Voltron Nevera, Steel Vengeance, Expedition GeForce, Olympia Looping
Parks visited: 232, Coasters Ridden: Steel: 894, Wood: 179, Total: 1073
FParker185

User avatar
 
Posts: 4508
Joined: February 5th, 2004, 12:04 am
Location: Joliet, IL

Postby rct2wizard360 on May 24th, 2010, 10:11 pm
Ever since Millenium Force was built I feel that B&M focused more towards reliability and keeping their rides to the highest of standards. However, since the highest/fastest race has kind of cooled down, they've been trying to make some more power punching rides.

But yes, certain B&M's would be extremely easy (and boring) to sit on for a day.
rct2wizard360

User avatar
 
Posts: 2996
Joined: December 4th, 2003, 11:23 pm
Location: Mason, Ohio

Postby BLADE on May 25th, 2010, 12:31 am
David wrote: Again, Why do people still buy from Intamin? Unless it's been tested before, and it wasn't problematic, WHY?

Variety, cost, and thrill factor. MF, Maverick, and TTD make one of the best trifectas at one park, globally. And guess what? They are all intamins.
BLADE

User avatar
 
Posts: 455
Joined: November 4th, 2009, 11:00 pm
Location: Se Wisconsin

Postby Cole on May 25th, 2010, 7:11 am
Lets stack it up.

Bull v. Mel
V2 v. TTD
S:UF or BTR vs. Maverick.

Intamin> B&M
Top 5: 1) El Toro. 2) Maverick. 3) Millenium Force. 4) Diamondback. 5) X2.
Coaster Count: 167 (41 Wood, 125 Steel)
@Coaster_Cole on Twitter
Cole

 
Posts: 1224
Joined: January 7th, 2010, 4:00 pm
Location: Milwaukee

Postby monsterfan99 on May 25th, 2010, 2:41 pm
^Well considering V2 is also an Intamin and would compared to Wicked Twister....
monsterfan99

User avatar
 
Posts: 1693
Joined: September 23rd, 2008, 4:48 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Postby david on May 25th, 2010, 3:11 pm
^^ How can you compare Bull and Millennium Force? Or INVERTED coasters to a sitdown launch coaster? I just don't get it.
david

 
Posts: 1546
Joined: September 27th, 2009, 11:29 am
Location: Northwest Suburbs

Postby Cole on May 25th, 2010, 3:14 pm
I was just stacking up there best three to our best three steel.
Top 5: 1) El Toro. 2) Maverick. 3) Millenium Force. 4) Diamondback. 5) X2.
Coaster Count: 167 (41 Wood, 125 Steel)
@Coaster_Cole on Twitter
Cole

 
Posts: 1224
Joined: January 7th, 2010, 4:00 pm
Location: Milwaukee

Postby david on May 25th, 2010, 3:15 pm
But they are MUCH different coasters, if they featured the same layouts but with two different designers, then you can compare them.
david

 
Posts: 1546
Joined: September 27th, 2009, 11:29 am
Location: Northwest Suburbs

Postby monsterfan99 on May 25th, 2010, 3:20 pm
Bizzaro Badger wrote:I was just stacking up there best three to our best three steel.

In your opinion their three best and "our" three best steel. I would not put 4 out of 6 side rides listed as best for either park. Also nothing like S:UF or TTD compare to either park.
monsterfan99

User avatar
 
Posts: 1693
Joined: September 23rd, 2008, 4:48 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Postby Cole on May 25th, 2010, 3:35 pm
Ugh, jjust forget what I said. :lol:
Top 5: 1) El Toro. 2) Maverick. 3) Millenium Force. 4) Diamondback. 5) X2.
Coaster Count: 167 (41 Wood, 125 Steel)
@Coaster_Cole on Twitter
Cole

 
Posts: 1224
Joined: January 7th, 2010, 4:00 pm
Location: Milwaukee

Postby BLADE on May 25th, 2010, 3:36 pm
David wrote. How can you compare Bull and Millennium Force? Or INVERTED coasters to a sitdown launch coaster? I just don't get it.

Bull and Millie are both sitdown, speed, noninverting steel. Both are from the hyper/giga class with different manufacturers. How can you not compare them?...............I think bizzaro badger was just refering to top 3 regardless of type.
BLADE

User avatar
 
Posts: 455
Joined: November 4th, 2009, 11:00 pm
Location: Se Wisconsin

Next

Return to General Coaster Talk

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests

Privacy Policy About Us Copyright Disclaimer E-Mail SFGAmWorld
COPYRIGHT - SFGAmWorld.com
All content and images on this site are Copyright 2001 - SFGAmWorld.com and may not be used without permission.
This is NOT the official site of Six Flags Great America, SFGAmWorld.com is not affilated or endorsed by Six Flags Great America.
SFGAmWorld.com does not make any guarantee on the accuracy of the information on this website and cannot be held responsible by the use of this information.
SIX FLAGS and all related indicia are trademarks of Six Flags Theme Parks Inc. ®, TM and © . The official Six Flags site can be found at SixFlags.com
BATMAN, SUPERMAN and all related characters and elements are trademarks of © DC Comics.
LOONEY TUNES and all related characters and elements are trademarks of and © Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.©
The Wiggles Pty Ltd. SCOOBY-DOO and all related characters and elements are trademarks of and © Hanna-Barbera.